I know you're not as fluent in English and I'm not going to penalize you for that, but do you realize there is no logic to your posts?
do u know what is sarcasm? i see you dont get it but if u do u will find the logic, is not that hard.
i see you cant reply my question even if you are fluent in english lol but its ok i know the answer
What? I don't care if it's in the shop or not, that means no difference too me. But for people spreading false information claiming the stone gives you access to all of these non existent things is just dumb. But I wouldn't expect you to understand, continue on with your day. I just want a solid argument as to how they're pay to win. Simple as that, don't come with a whole bunch of BS that has nothing to do with nothing. That's all this thread has been anyways, I asked for a simple task; yet people can't seem to provide me with the information
In this we have to agree, u are defending an item that cost real money to have an advantage ingame, right? thats not false information .
Then u can consider bigger or smaller that advantage, but NEVER can say is non-existent advantage because, if doesnt give anything what a reason to pay for it, no one pays for "nothing" that have a logic .
Thats a fact, dont tell me is false information.
I dont know of what era of videogames you belong to, but an item that cost money to give you advantage it will be always P2W,
if this hard to u understand this means that u didnt play videogames before that kind options existed and everything had to be achieved by skills ,not money.
In fact this game was developed with that concept of p2w as many old f2p and the stone is not the only item designed for that, but thats other subject that have to manage daneos , for me all items that give advantage should have a drop rate and not be sold for money
only aesthetic stuff like vehicles ,skins ,dogis,diff pets, that would be the perfect server ( is my opinion dont kill me cashers i dont take the decisions)
by the way i provided you a definition from pw2 before in other threads, simplest and most solid than a definition, i cant. i didnt write that definition on the internet. tell to who writed its wrong definition or false.