*Poll* For you, what is the best formula?

None of them for me. Old damage was a little to low compaired with old HK version. However it was not so far from it, new one after update yesterday was fun for a moment, but nonsens 35k crit with +7 weapon for DW? Come on..

So i pick old one - with little increase..

i think sk have to much def and high dmg that why 90% game are all sk ,because other class dont have dmg and def . I cant undedtant why sk +10 do more dmg , if i have all +15 that patethic

Quote from tobi114

i think sk have to much def and high dmg that why 90% game are all sk ,because other class dont have dmg and def . I cant undedtant why sk +10 do more dmg , if i have all +15 that patethic

What you talking about? 90% are MA

..p

and those are the ones that cry the most

P.s hsperer stop making these threads over and over again, op dmg wont be coming back like it did, just deal with it. You played 2 days with that dmg and all you cry about is that now

please guys, stop making these polls, daneos wont change back to the last formula, it was pretty unbalanced, he will adjust the damage, but not put that formula again

These threads are the equivalent of making a poll for who you would've voted for in the '16 election right now.

You can vote for your candidate..

but no matter who you choose it's not going to change what's already happened.

You and your cohorts can keep making these polls, it's just going to end with the same responses every time.

I really feel like the lack of dodge for SM's and Fighters is making the loss of DMG even more emphasized.

DBO(G) wasn't and shouldn't be a one dimensional game, so DMG shouldn't be the ONLY factor in deciding the state of the game. There are still plenty of things missing that are meant to add to the depth of DBOG. Only time will tell.

Every stat except CON and ENG seems to be a bit of a broken mess rn, not just damage, so I dunno why damage is constantly being pointed at as the culprit of everyone's problems?